Monday, November 11, 2013

Ignorance is Bliss

Ignorance is Bliss

Temptation flows like the juice of ripe peaches,
You’ll see, when you get the chance to gaze upon the tree of knowledge
Looking up, I realize it towers me like a skyscraper,
Robins and calapitters nestling into their homes
The air, tasting sweet, as if the molecules of humidity and immorality can’t resist mixing with the evaporated seeping juices of the fruits and sweet wickedness,
And it all matches perfectly with the alluring smell of a goddess’s strawberry bubble-bath
Even touching the bark feels sinful
Wrongdoing tastes the way pillows of clouds feel…until the first bite is taken
Satan thrives here in the Garden of Eden,
He doesn’t Thrive here, he’s condemned here, just like you…
Bear skin once feeling only natural, now feels raunchy,
Lawlessness seems legit and repentance is now mandatory
Sin is forever in your heart, now found deep within your soul, and all because you wanted more perception.
The government is making clones of every single person in the world,
And the immoral women of libido have vanished
We’re as content as blood sucking mosquitoes
Flying from indulgence to indulgence, overdosing every night on smuttiness
Not even Cadabra can save you from tomorrow…
And now here we are, possessed dolls, roaming the earth, wasting our days attacking and criticizing everyone’s move
Dio ti ama mia cara bella bella e lo faccio anche
The serpent will always be stirring up some trickery,
So don’t fall for the magic
Remember… Ignorance is Bliss 

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Society is Sick! Carnism is Everywhere

Roughly ten percent of Israel identifies as ‘vegan’. The Taiwan government supports and urges a 

‘one-day-a-week vegetarian diet’ and firmly regulates animal product labeling on food. Almost 

one third of India’s 1.2 billion people are vegetarians. Cuisine in Korea has a deep Buddhist

temple tradition; meaning many popular meals are vegan. The UK is home to several of the most

popular vegan restaurants in the world. In Italy, where olive oil is the basis of most recipes, not

butter, one can ‘skip the cheese’ and certainly find animal product free dishes throughout the entire

country (Peaceful Dumpling 2013). Although these facts are true, they do not get at the history of

obstacles veganism has had to overcome in order to grow into what it is today and what it could


In 1894 when the first vegetarian eating-house opened in Moscow, the Russian police were told they could not let vegetarianism grow without supervision and hindrance, and the authorities even went as far as ensuring restaurants did not exhibit the word "vegetarian” (Davis). The Big Soviet Encyclopedia (1961) commented: "Vegetarianism is based on false hypothesis and ideas and has no followers in the Soviet Union!" The word "vegetarian" was taken away from the dictionaries of the Russian language. But obstacles are not only found in the past, according to the U.S. Deparment of Agriculture, the average American today consumes nearly twice his or her weight in meat each year. Our globalized society still has a very long way to come in terms of the food industry, before it can be considered vegan, compassionate, or ‘humane’. Using animals for food, clothing, etc. is a global social justice issue that needs to be brought to the surface and discussed on both local and national levels everywhere.
According to the New York Times, "Carnism is a term given to psychological disconnect which allows people to eat animals while remaining resolutely sentimental about others." Urban Dictionary calls carnism, "The psychology that animals were put on this earth for the sole purpose of feeding and entertaining humans, and that they have no inherit value if they cannot be used by humans.

“Carnism is a dominant, entrenched system; for 

better or worse, we are all participants in 

the system. Our choice is not whether we 

participate, but how we participate. With an 

awareness of carnism we can choose to be 

active witnesses rather than passive bystanders, 
informed consumers and empowered citizens. 

With awareness we can make choices that are 

in the best interest of ourselves, animals, and our planet, and live more authentic and freely 

chosen lives.” ( 2013). also claims, “Carnism is 

structured like other “isms” which are 

organized around the oppression of 

certain groups of “others.” And while 

the experience of each set of victims 

will always be unique, the ideologies are 
structurally similar, as the mentality 
which enables such oppression is the 

same. To create a more humane and 

just society, then, we appreciate that  eating animals is a social justice issue, and we must 

include carnism in our analysis.”

           It’s important to note that although vegetarianism is moving in the ‘right direction’, it is not truly a plant-based ideology, as its name would suggest. In fact it can be found on the continuum of carnism, and therefore should not be held to the same moral value as veganism. Veganism, also has a spectra; ranging from eating no animal products to consuming and purchasing no animal products, but the ideology is far more stringent and the global goal. It is unclear, and hard to empirically state, why carnism exists. And at the same time it’s also hard to explain why veganism is spreading and gaining more and more popularity. A lot of the reasoning behind diet  modifications is due to new health discoveries. It is without doubt that animal product free diets are healthier than any alternative. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics declares ‘a plant-based diet is both nutritionally sound and even more healthful than a carnistic diet.’ Recently both the WHO and FAO have concluded that changes in diet in the second half of the 20th Century have seen “traditional, more plant-based diets replace high-fat, energy-dense diets with a substantial content of animal food. This has played a ‘key role’ in the upsurge of diet-related preventable diseases.” These preventable diseases include obesity, heart disease, adult-onset diabetes, and even cancer. Veganism has also proved to decrease redness and irritation of the skin, reduce the incidence of diabetes, the risk of cataract development, the risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, stroke, lower cholesterol, decrease the chance of developing kidney stones, and satisfy all your nutritional requirements (Edward F. 2013).

            However, despite these claims, many people still argue about the benefits of eating animals. Contrary to popular belief fish is not the only food source with alpha-linolenic acid (ALNA), long-chain Omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Vegan food sources like walnut, flaxseed (linseed), mustard, and rapeseed (canola) oil all contain these natural beneficial nutrients (Davis 2013). According to the WHO website, “Fish and shellfish contain toxic chemicals at concentrations as high as nine million times those found in the water in which they swim. A particular concern is that fish contain high levels of methylmercury contamination, associated with rises in blood pressure, impaired neurological function in infants and reduced fertility in adults.”
            Another common source of confusion is that cow’s milk is ‘good for you’. Turns out there is 

no evidence that milk ‘makes your bones stronger’ or helps you in anyway for that matter. In fact 

countries that have the highest daily consumption of dairy milk, ironically also have the highest 

prevalence of osteoporosis (WHO). The type of calcium that actually does help build bone health can 

be found in vegan foods like kale and broccoli. In terms of saturated fat content, drinking eight 

ounces of milk a day is equivalent to eating a Big Mac with fries or twelve strips of bacon (Roberts 

2012). But regardless of the science, according to a November 2001 report by the World Bank, 

Livestock Development- Implications for Rural Poverty, the Environment, and Global Food Security, 

‘total global meat demand is expected to grow from 209 million tons in 1997 to 327 million tons in 

2020 (56%). Over the same period global animal milk consumption is expected to increase from 

about 422 million tons to 648 million tons (54%).’

            Perhaps it is the health benefits that are converting ‘meat-eaters’ to vegans or perhaps more 

and more people are going ‘animal-product free’ because of the community benefits of doing so. For 

those who are and are not concerned about our environment, we should all start considering reduction 

of consumption of animal products as vital as recycling correctly and reducing car use.

            According to ChooseVeg.Com, almost 80% of land deforested in the Amazon is now used as 

cattle pasture, 70% of the grain grown in the US is fed to farmed animals, switching to a diet free of 

meat, dairy, and eggs saves more carbon emissions than driving a Prius, and raising animals for food 

(including land used for grazing and growing feed crops) now uses a staggering 30% of the Earth’s 

land mass. states: 
            “Veganism greatly decreases the wastes, pollution, and deforestation caused by mass animal food production. The United States and China, which contain 25 percent of the world's population, combine to consume 35 percent of the world's  beef, over half of the world's poultry, and 65 percent of the world's pork. If Brazil and the European Union are included, this group - roughly 33 percent of the world's population consumes more than 60 percent of the world's beef, more than 70 percent of the world's poultry, and more than 80 percent of the world's pork.  
            Today, our planet is home to nearly 1 billion pigs, 1.3 billion cows, 1.8 billion sheep and goats, and 13.5 billion chickens. These animals need to be fed. They need water to survive. If they are ranged, they need land. And these animals produce enormous quantities of waste.
            Seven kilograms of grain are required to produce 1 kilogram of beef; the conversion is 4-to-1 for pork and 2-to-1 for poultry. Each kilogram of meat  represents several kilograms of grain that could be consumed directly by humans, not to mention the water and farmland required growing the grain. To put this in simplified terms, the beef in a hamburger represents enough wheat to produce five  loaves of bread. Huge amounts of food - not to mention the water and farmland required growing the food - can be freed up by modest reduction in meat production. For example, if the 670 million tons of the world's grain that is fed to livestock were reduced by 10 percent, the resulting grain could feed 225 million people or to keep up with growth in the human population over the next three years. If each American reduced his or her meat consumption by just 5 percent, roughly equivalent to eating one less dish of meat each week, enough grain would be saved to feed 25 million people - the number estimated to go hungry in the United States each day.
              In the United States, where 130 times more animal manure is produced  than human waste - 5 tons for every U.S. citizen - animal waste is the principal    source of water pollution. And livestock farms are getting larger throughout the world. Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin's recent bill to reform livestock waste management   estimates that one 50,000-acre hog farm under construction in Utah will produce   more waste than the city of Los Angeles.

            According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the world's livestock herds are the 

largest source of human-induced emissions of methane - a potent greenhouse gas contributing to 

climate change. The University of Chicago, cited this fact from the EPA, and found that being 

vegan is more effective in the fight against global warming; a vegan is responsible for the release 

of approximately 1.5 fewer tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year than is a meat-


            However, there is even more to worry about than CO2. According to, “Nitrous 

oxide is about 300 times more potent as a global warming gas than carbon dioxide.” According to 

the U.N., “the meat, egg, and dairy industries account for a staggering 65 percent of worldwide 

nitrous oxide emissions.” Eliminating and destroying carnism, which would in turn be embracing 

and actively practicing veganism, would reduce destruction of tropical rainforests and topsoil, 

reduces ecological footprints, and most importantly helps ensure environmental sustainability 

(Organic & Natural 2012). 

Eradicating carnism would also reduce destruction of endangered species and wildlife habitats, 

avoid further pollution of rivers, oceans, and streams, and also reduce the use of chemicals, growth 

hormones, and antibiotics in our food.

            USDA researchers have found that “…eating two ounces of chicken per day—the equivalent 

of a third to a half of a boneless breast—exposes a consumer to 3 to 5 micrograms of inorganic 

arsenic, the element’s most toxic form.” Daily exposure to low doses of arsenic can cause cancer, 

dementia, neurological problems, and other ailments in humans.

            To many people the health and environmental benefits that come with the elimination of 

carnism are the reason for changing their diet, but for many other vegans and human rights 

activists, the reason for their no-animal-product diets is more about the pain inflicted on animals. 

Scientists have proven animals can feel pain. This means cows, chickens, pigs, and even fish. 

“’Wild-caught’ sea animals suffer immensely, and overfishing is responsible for the injury or 

death of nearly 30 million tons of inadvertently caught sea animals (dolphins, birds, turtles, etc.) 

annually and for the fact that 70 percent of the world’s fish populations are either fully 

exploited or depleted” (PETA 2012).  The pain inflicted among animals used for the production

 of commercialized food, fur, shampoo, makeup, etc. is undeniable, tragic, and heartbreaking, yet 

these procedures remain the norm in our world today.

            Up to now the heath issues of carnism, which are both psychological and physical, have been addressed using strategies such as shame tactics, public announcements, campaigns, and celebrity endorsement. Although these efforts have made a difference in creating the vegan population and enthusiasm that exist today; this process of transforming society’s mind set is a long, difficult, and sensitive process, and unfortunately we still live in a world full of slaughter houses, hypocrites, and incomprehension/lack of education today.
            I do believe the creation of the word ‘carnism’ and the spreading awareness of this social 

issue is what will address and destroy carnism in the coming decade. ‘Carnism’ does something 

that ‘veganism’ doesn’t and can’t. Carnism address more than the fact that some people eat meat 

and some people don’t, it digs deeper to try and explain and address why people eat cows but not 

dogs, or why some people don’t eat eggs but wear fur. 

The invisibility of carnism makes eating animals appear to be simply a matter of personal ethics, rather than what it actually is: the inevitable end result of a deeply entrenched, oppressive system” (

         When our globe as a whole truly realizes the dangers of the gruesome habits of carnism, we 

will as an entire world become publically healthier. Jiddu Krishnamurti said it best when he said, 

“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”

Sources Cited:

Davis, John. "International Vegetarian Union - History of Vegetarianism - Russian Vegetarian Societies." International Vegetarian Union - History of Vegetarianism- Russian Vegetarian Societies. International Vegetarian Union, 15 Oct. 2013.Web. 07 Oct. 2013.

Dumpling, Peaceful. "Top 6 Most Vegan Friendly Countries in the World." Peaceful Dumpling, 8 Aug. 2013. Web. 08 Oct. 2013.

Franz, Edward. "9 Health Benefits of a Vegetarian Diet." Natural Health Organic Living   Blog. Global Healing Center, 1998-2013. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.
Mercy For Animals. "We All Want to Help Theplanet. But How?" Eating Vegetarian Is Good for the Environment. N.p., 2013. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.

Organic & Natural. "Top 10 Reasons Why It's Green to Go Veggie." Down to Earth Organic & Natural, 2012. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. "Fight Global Warming by Going Vegetarian." N.p., 2013. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.

Roberts, Ethan. "How Carnism Impacts You and Your World." How Carnism Impacts You and Your World., 2013. Web. 18 Oct. 2013.

"Urban Dictionary: Carnism." Urban Dictionary. N.p., 2012. Web. 18 Oct. 2013.

"Vegan 2000." ThinkQuest. Oracle Foundation, 2000. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.

Vocab, Schott. "Carnism." Schotts Vocab Carnism Comments. New York Times, 11 Jan.   2010. Web. 17 Oct. 2013.

World Health Organization. "Human Vitamin and Mineral Requirements." FOOD SND     AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS. WORLD   HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2002. Web. 14 Oct. 2013.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Where is the Humanity?!

Rhetoric, a term often thrown around by students in the hallways of college English departments, offers much more to society than people may realize. In terms of public health, personal healthcare, and health/medicine in general, rhetoric is crucial way for society to develop and determine the personal notion of the good life; the true ideal state of health and well-being. Because of rhetoric both non-verbal and verbal, we as communities are able to pinpoint illness, identify resources, cure society, prevent disasters, and build a standard of quality in terms of health; these acts in turn define ‘healthy’ and ‘well-being’.
            In the hallways of the hospitals, clung to the walls, mounted on the nurses, doctors, and medical students, there is a culture. It has no boundaries and abides to no one. Certain requirements must be met for the culture to exist; and it can live in a wide range of places; from developing counties to five star hospitals in upstate New York; there is no stopping the sophistication once it has begun. Inside this culture there is a rhetoric that exists, the way medical professionals approach work and communicate with both their colleagues and patients. Often this healthcare network of people compare patients to industrialized objects; this metaphor has both advantages and disadvantages, but in the end is a more dangerous than safe approach.
            In medical school it is often an advantage for students to approach their patients as computers. This methodology allows the professional to focus on locating the ‘problem’ or disease within the human’s body without getting emotionally involved with their love lives and work situations, but in turn this approach really dehumanizes the patient. When people are compared and referred to by others with ‘more authority’ than themselves as merely objects, it is easy for them to feel concerned that their own personal attentions do not matter, or that they are not special and that their personal needs and interests are just like everyone else’s. This kind of mentality from communities can lead to a lack of trust among healthcare providers and this possibly could lead to the crumbling of the infrastructure of the public’s health.
            A lot of doctors and medical professionals act like the oil industries and treat consumers like cars. Perhaps the average person would consider being called a ‘classic’ or ‘fast’, ‘slick’, and ‘legendary’ as a compliment, but in a way referring to a person as a car implies they are mindless, and incapable of providing maintenance to themselves. Healthcare providers know that patients will always come back for more ‘care’, the same way people always return to fill their gas tanks. This could be a good way to look at the industry, needs are identified and services are then provided, but often these healthcare companies take advantage of this metaphor and will charge big bucks for very inexpensive necessities that have the potential to help people meet their basic needs, and eventually create a overall healthier society.
            Rudolf Virchow a famous pathologist, writer, politician, and German doctor said it best when he said, “The improvement of medicine may eventually prolong human life, but the improvement of social conditions can achieve this result more rapidly and more successfully.” The point to take from this quote is that social aspects of healthcare are more important and powerful in some ways than medicine itself. One aspect to this social property is absolutely rhetorics. Communication within the healthcare system needs to be more humane and compassionate. By eliminating the metaphors between patients and industrialized objects, healthcare can come closer to reaching a state of maxim general welfare.